A Critique of the Antimoon Method of Language Learning

The antimoon method is good, still, there are points to criticise.

The Antimoon Method is a popular language learning approach that has garnered attention and followers over the years. While it has undoubtedly helped some learners achieve their goals, it’s essential to examine the method critically to determine whether it’s the best fit for your learning style and objectives. In this article, we’ll explore the Antimoon Method, discuss some potential drawbacks, and suggest alternative approaches to consider.

I. What is the Antimoon Method?

The Antimoon Method is a language learning approach developed by Tomasz P. Szynalski and Michal Ryszard Wojcik, two Polish learners who achieved near-native fluency in English. The method emphasizes the following principles:

  1. Make no mistakes: The method prioritizes not making mistakes.
  2. Input-based learning: Prioritizing reading and listening to authentic materials in the target language, rather than focusing on speaking and writing.
  3. Extensive use of Spaced Repetition Systems (SRS): The method encourages learners to create and review digital flashcards for vocabulary, grammar, and idiomatic expressions.
  4. Avoiding traditional classrooms and textbooks: The Antimoon Method suggests that self-directed learning using authentic materials is more effective than traditional language classes and textbooks.

II. Why it Gets it Wrong

While the Antimoon Method has helped some learners, it’s important to recognize its potential shortcomings:

  1. Comprehensible input is not the top priority.
  2. Not suitable for all learners: The self-directed nature of the Antimoon Method may not suit all learners. Some individuals benefit from structured lessons, guidance from teachers, and opportunities for peer interaction.
  3. Overemphasis on SRS: While Spaced Repetition Systems can be useful for vocabulary retention, they shouldn’t be the sole focus of language learning. Other strategies, such as immersion, conversation practice, and active listening, are also essential for language acquisition.

III. What to Do Instead

If you’re not convinced that the Antimoon Method is the best approach for you, consider these alternative strategies:

  1. Priority number one is comprehensible input that is catering to native speakers! 
  2. Balanced input and output: Instead of focusing solely on input, incorporate speaking and writing practice into your language learning routine. This can be done through language exchanges, conversation practice apps, or writing exercises.
  3. Structured lessons: If you prefer a more structured approach to learning, consider enrolling in a language course, hiring a tutor, or following a textbook or online course.
  4. Diversify learning techniques: Don’t rely solely on SRS for language learning. Use a variety of techniques, such as immersion, listening to podcasts, watching movies and TV shows in the target language, and engaging in conversations with native speakers.


The Antimoon Method, while successful for some language learners, may not be the best approach for everyone. It’s essential to consider your learning style, preferences, and goals when choosing a language learning strategy. By examining the Antimoon Method’s critiques and exploring alternative approaches, you can develop a well-rounded and effective language learning plan tailored to your needs.